top of page

Annotated Bibliographies

Morgan Land

 

Mrs. Killingsworth

 

Honors Mentorship

 

15 December 2014

 

Annotated Bibliography

 

Pellegrini, Dr. Anthony D., and Catherine M. Bohn-Gettler. "The Benefits of Recess in Primary School." - Scholarpedia. 1 Jan. 2013. Web. 11 Dec. 2014. <http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/The_Benefits_of_Recess_in_Primary_School>.

           

Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler’s article offers scientifically proven facts on the benefit of recess in elementary school aged children. The authors take a serious approach to a subject that has often been seen as unimportant or unnecessary. Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler divide their article up into sections so that they may clearly lay out the information presented. Each section offers different reasons as to why recess is incredibly important to children, as well as tying the new information to the previous section. In this article, the authors bring to light a forgotten necessity in the schooling of children.

 

            In the first section, the authors lay out the benefits of recess in primary schools. Their goal is to present you with facts that are backed by credible resources. Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler want the reader to do his or her own research in order to form a more educated opinion on the importance of recess. The writers stress the importance of learning in different environments. They understand that there are some things that can’t be taught in a traditional classroom setting.  Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler make the point that working adults are given breaks as a standard practice in the workforce in order to increase the productivity of its workers. Why then, should we not provide a break for our youth to produce the same result? Elementary school is a crucial point in children’s lives where they learn very important social and problem solving skills. Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler further explain important developments and much more in the first section.

 

            In the second section, Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler question the system as recess time decreases. The push for academic success in schools is a wonderful thing, but where is the limit? Students who are continuously pushed to use their brains for strenuous activities soon lose the ability to concentrate, and therefore, cannot preform to the best of their ability. The writers describe how recess was either cut completely from many schools or reduced significantly. They also define recess as unconstructed free play in order to provide a distinction between a physical education class and recess. Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler discuss the negative results of cutting out breaks for students, and closes off the idea that P.E. could provide an adequate substitute.

 

            In the last section of the article, Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler further discuss the importance of recess. In this section, the authors restate their argument and defend it strongly with evidence. They look at the attention spans of children and the amount of time a child is able to completely focus on a task at hand. Dr. Pellegrini and Bohn-Gettler exercise their ability to persuade the reader to see their side. Their points are powerful and demand to be thought over.

 

            The sections in this text made the article both easier to understand and more organized. Their arguments could easily be used in debates over recess in the elementary schools today. Those who read the article should find it both engaging and insightful. They should be inspired to learn more after being presented information to think over.

Morgan Land

 

Mrs. Killingsworth

 

Honors Mentorship

 

21 September 2014

 

Annotated Bibliography

 

Kagan, Sharon L., and Jeanne L. Reid. "Invest in Early Childhood Education." Phi Delta Kappan Apr. 2009: 572-76. GALILEO. Web. 15 Sept. 2014. <http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=93eba23e-1b48-458a-b981-af785eed1a6a%40sessionmgr111&vid=2&hid=109>.

 

This article discusses the importance of Early Childhood Education. It proposes that the government should implement certain programs to aide in creating a stronger educational system. The authors Sharon Lynn Kagan and Jeanne L. Reid state “We assume high-quality early education programs would offer both care and education, with the paramount goal of readiness for school and life” (574). The article emphasizes the fact that a family should be able to make their own decision on whether or not to enroll their child. The article recommends 13 ways the government could develop a universal and sustained approach to early childhood education. The authors then take up the argument that the lack of long term planning and organization has created an enormous amount of problems. These problems are spread across federal agencies and committees that demand excellence, coherence, and equality in early childhood education and the programs we have in place simply do not adhere to their standards. This article serves to provide potential solutions to these problems. These issues must be confronted at once. According to the authors, “In no other field is the evidence of efficacy so compelling, and in no other field is the potential for future investment so promising” (576).

 

The authors, Sharon Lynn Kagan and Jeanne L. Reid, are experts in their topic. They provide information that is still current in early childhood education today. They are aware of the counter arguments that could be used against their beliefs and combat them with their research from multiple sources. The authors then provide the resources they used at the end of the article in an easy format for the reader to look up themselves. The article was published in the magazine Phi Delta Kappan. This magazine is known for its quality, informative articles. The article also appears on the credible website Galileo, which only further establishes the fact that is article is a reliable source. The information laid out in the article is very well-documented. The authors are able to deliver their arguments in a clear and concise way. Mrs. Kagan and Mrs. Reid’s article is assertive, in depth, and well-researched.

 

The article fits well into my research on the importance of early childhood education. It provided me with new insight on the importance of government involvement and the decisions of the parents. I found the article immensely helpful. Many of the points discussed in the article had never crossed my mind before reading it. The new view point helped me to create a more well-rounded argument for my research project. This source will be easy to pull information from in the future.

If asked to reflect on our elementary school days, most of us can conjure up fond memories made on the playground. It was at recess that most of us made key friends that helped us through our elementary years and later on in life. It is safe to conclude that in most cases, recess is something a child can look forward to during the school day. However, recently recess has been under attack. Many schools have made the decision to cut back on recess or do away with it entirely. This decision was not made to crush the joy of children, but to increase the amount of educational time a child recieves and in return, improve their test scores. While the idea was meant to improve our students, many of those in charge failed to realize the importance of recess on the social, physical, and cognitive development of children. At the same time, it is also important to realize that all play and no work is not benifical either. It is essential to find a haapy medium that balances both work and play in order to produce the most successful students.

 

Those who argue for taking away recess make very good points. However, their points were ill conceived. It seems only logical that increasing classroom time would increse the test scores and the amount of material covered by students. In reality, the exact opposite appears to be happening based on research conducted. However, many superintendents, principals, and government officals still believe elimnating recess and other expendable classes are the best way to better their students and schools. Their points included: recess is a waste of valuable time; recess can interrupt consistent concentration; and recess can disturb the flow of the classroom. Recess can be considered disrutpive to both concentration and the flow of class time. However, this disruptive behavior is usually due to kids loosing focus and need a break from their school work. They also pose the arugment that kids are difficult to settle down after coming in from recess. In most cases, children are very easy to settle back down, especially after they have had time to run out all of their pent up energy. Once they settled in, they are usually ready to learn and show greater focus. The argument made that states recess is a waste of time, I find invalid. It is very clear that recess is beneficial in many ways. 

 

We now know that recess has a huge impact on a childs social, emotional, phycial and cognitive development. In a social asspect, during recess, children learn conflict resolution, sharing, team work, and how to interact with their peers. Ont the playground, children also learn how to cooperate with one another, take turns, and compromise. These skills then can then trasfer into the classroom and makes it easier for group assignments.  Emotionally, children develop bonds between one another through freindships. They also develop compassion and learn to comfort one another when an injury or bullying occurs. From a health stand point, recess may be the only time of day a child is active. The children get to go outside in the fresh air and be active. This can greatly help cut back on childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes. Children are also full of pent up energy. They need a positive outlet to release this energy. Recess provides this outlet. On a cognitive level, child are allowed to take a mental break from the stresses of the classroom. After a particularly hard test or unit, children often show signs of restlessness and lose the ability to focus. Providing a break or going to recess has a recharging effect on a child. The children are also allowed to play in an unstructutred manner when they go outside for recess. When allowed to do so, children use their imagination and create their own rules and games. This helps expand their creativity and mental thought process.

 

Once kids have been given the chance to get their "wiggles out", they are more likely to be productive students. In the studies conducted on recess and it's impact on children, a common characterisitc has appeared. Recess improves work ethic, attentiveness, and focus of children. Before recess time children become fidgety and excited as they anticipate their time for play. This maybe where those who argue against recess make their claims. During this time, children may act out or lose focus. However, the improvement of behavior, attitude, and work ethic after recess has a far greater positive imact on the classroom when weighing it between the negative impact before recess time. Therefore, in conculsion, finding a happy medium between work and play is essential. While covering material is important, it is just as important to ensure that the material covered is being absorbed by the students. Recess prepares your students to learn and be ready to absorb the new information presented.

 

 

Morgan Land

 

Mrs. Killingsworth

 

Honors Mentorship

 

2 February 2015

 

Annotated Bibliography

 

Jarrett, Olga S., Pamela Hoge, Gwen Davies, Darlene M. Maxwell, Amy Yetley, and Carrie Dickerson. "Impact of Recess on Classroom Behavior: Group Effects and Indiviual Differenc." Journal of Educational Research 92.2 (1998): 121. Galileo. Web. 2 Feb. 2015.

 

The authors of this article offer scientific evidence on the debate of whether continuous, rigorous instructional time or instructional time broken up by breaks is more beneficial for children. They take a very professional and factual approach when presenting their findings in the article. The authors provide charts and graphs to better showcase their data along with statistics. The article is broken up in to 5 sections. The sections are very descriptive. The authors describes the process for conducting the experiment and the environment in which the experiment took place. The study was so closely monitored that 14 of the original subjects were dropped from the study because they could not record consistent data or the data was compromised .The authors took great care to record every detail they could in order to ensure they got the best results possible. As the scientists observed the children they recorded data in three categories: “work, fidgety, and listless.”  The scientists looked for on task behavior, looking at the teacher when he or she was talking, excessive movement, sitting partly out of the chair, laying their heads on the desk, and staring out of the window. These key things the scientists looked for were recorded both before and after recess.  In their conclusion the authors found that most children improved in work ethic and focus after taking part in unconstructed play or recess. The scientific backing of their argument gives the reader reassurance concerning the credibility of this article.

Research

bottom of page